Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19911 - 19920 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 19911 - 19920 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI App 47
because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79424 - 2014-09-15
because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79424 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
Jerome A. Bence, Jr. v. James A. Spinato
the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7920 - 2017-09-19
the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7920 - 2017-09-19
WI App 47 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP691-CR Complete Title ...
to resentencing because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79424 - 2012-04-24
to resentencing because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79424 - 2012-04-24
Jerome A. Bence, Jr. v. James A. Spinato
properly terminated the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7920 - 2005-03-31
properly terminated the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7920 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial. The attorneys told the circuit court that they were prepared to try the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28699 - 2007-04-16
a trial. The attorneys told the circuit court that they were prepared to try the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28699 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion seeking a new trial. DiFrances argues he was denied the constitutionally effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
motion seeking a new trial. DiFrances argues he was denied the constitutionally effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief. He alleges that he was deprived of the right to be present at his trial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
postconviction relief. He alleges that he was deprived of the right to be present at his trial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
. ¶3 As pertinent to this appeal, in motions after verdict, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28300 - 2007-03-05
. ¶3 As pertinent to this appeal, in motions after verdict, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28300 - 2007-03-05

