Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 29749 for des.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 29749 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706510 - 2023-09-26
judgment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706510 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶13, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. This court reviews de novo whether the facts establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971144 - 2025-06-17
, ¶13, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. This court reviews de novo whether the facts establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971144 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
Margaret Barber v. Carole Barber Stoviak
standard for undue influence is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3937 - 2017-09-20
standard for undue influence is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3937 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
was deficient and whether any deficiencies caused prejudice are legal questions that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940799 - 2025-04-15
Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6796 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chue Moua
the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767, 791, 440 N.W.2d 317, 327 (1989). First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11684 - 2005-03-31
the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767, 791, 440 N.W.2d 317, 327 (1989). First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11684 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 66. However, we uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39278 - 2014-09-15
a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 66. However, we uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39278 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leslie M. Pirk
constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. A new factor is "a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8222 - 2017-09-19
constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. A new factor is "a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8222 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert M. May
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James V. Holschbach v. Washington Park Manor
therefore affirm. ¶2 This case comes before us on summary judgment. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7518 - 2017-09-19
therefore affirm. ¶2 This case comes before us on summary judgment. We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7518 - 2017-09-19