Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 65155 for or b.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
)(a) and (b),[3] pursuant to SCR 20:8.4(f). Additionally, by failing to file a SCR 22.26(1)(e) post
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
)(a) and (b),[3] pursuant to SCR 20:8.4(f). Additionally, by failing to file a SCR 22.26(1)(e) post
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
State v. Daniel P. Moen
. It was reasonable for the jury to infer from these facts that he was operating the vehicle. B. Defense Motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4457 - 2005-03-31
. It was reasonable for the jury to infer from these facts that he was operating the vehicle. B. Defense Motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4457 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: michael b. brennan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
: michael b. brennan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
Appeal No
. § 971.31(5)(b), which states that in felony cases, “motions to suppress evidence or motions under s. 971.23
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27550 - 2006-12-26
. § 971.31(5)(b), which states that in felony cases, “motions to suppress evidence or motions under s. 971.23
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27550 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion.1 ¶2 Bishop began having sexual intercourse with Rebecca B. when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93595 - 2014-09-15
denying his postconviction motion.1 ¶2 Bishop began having sexual intercourse with Rebecca B. when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93595 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court properly took judicial notice of those records.[6] Wis. Stat. § 902.01(2)(b). Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
. The circuit court properly took judicial notice of those records.[6] Wis. Stat. § 902.01(2)(b). Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
[PDF]
State v. James Stankiewicz
). 2 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(b), STATS. No. 96-1382-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20
). 2 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(b), STATS. No. 96-1382-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these things was aggravating to the offense.” Horne argued that, “[b]ecause the court considered Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
these things was aggravating to the offense.” Horne argued that, “[b]ecause the court considered Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919624 - 2025-02-26
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use of that property …; or b. Loss of use of tangible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63132 - 2011-04-25
to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use of that property …; or b. Loss of use of tangible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63132 - 2011-04-25