Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 19921 - 19930 of 58510 for speedy trial.
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Parnell was convicted of (1) second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Parnell was convicted of (1) second-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief. He alleges that he was deprived of the right to be present at his trial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
postconviction relief. He alleges that he was deprived of the right to be present at his trial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
WI App 47
because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79424 - 2014-09-15
because the trial court relied upon an improper factor in sentencing him; and (4) he should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79424 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerome A. Bence, Jr. v. James A. Spinato
the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7920 - 2017-09-19
the lease prior to Spinato's request. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in its entirety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7920 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
? ANSWER: $10,935.00. ¶3 As pertinent to this appeal, in motions after verdict, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28300 - 2014-09-15
? ANSWER: $10,935.00. ¶3 As pertinent to this appeal, in motions after verdict, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28300 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 146
to the trial court to hold a postconviction hearing and make the factual findings necessary for this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33673 - 2008-09-23
to the trial court to hold a postconviction hearing and make the factual findings necessary for this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33673 - 2008-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial. The attorneys told the circuit court that they were prepared to try the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28699 - 2007-04-16
a trial. The attorneys told the circuit court that they were prepared to try the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28699 - 2007-04-16
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on “great bodily harm”; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
WI APP 146
mechanism in some circumstances. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33673 - 2014-09-15
mechanism in some circumstances. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33673 - 2014-09-15