Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19931 - 19940 of 29817 for des.

State v. James R. Thiel
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶22
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Madison Crushing & Excavating Co., Inc. v. Volkmann Railroad Builders, Inc.
River Rail.3 This is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3405 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 96
it also logically follows that were we to use what amounts to de novo review of the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84796 - 2014-09-15

Stephen V. Hannigan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
not. See Village of De Forest v. County of Dane, 211 Wis.2d 804, 810, 565 N.W.2d 296, 299 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14492 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
that courts should review the administrator's determination under a de novo standard. In particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67601 - 2011-07-07

[PDF] Bruce Larson v. Elizabeth Burmaster,
for failure to state a claim is de novo. Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 2005 WI 123, ¶19, 284 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25664 - 2017-09-21

Antoinette Robinson v. Town of Bristol
consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5293 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
upon by the circuit court,” and he requests that we conduct our own de novo review of the client file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735440 - 2023-12-06

[PDF] Frontsheet
is a question of law that we review de novo. Myers v. DNR, 2019 WI 5, ¶18, 385 Wis. 2d 176, 922 N.W.2d 47
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320032 - 2021-02-15

Frontsheet
will require us to interpret statutes. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137411 - 2015-03-31