Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19931 - 19940 of 82352 for simple case.
Search results 19931 - 19940 of 82352 for simple case.
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
with child enticement and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
with child enticement and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He was sentenced to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
and pled not guilty. His case was tried to a jury, which found him guilty. He was sentenced to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
Beverly Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
oath. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case began when Beverly Johnson reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5365 - 2005-03-31
oath. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case began when Beverly Johnson reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094583 - 2026-03-26
at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094583 - 2026-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
waitlist for a prior sentence based on his SAP ineligibility in this case. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001673 - 2025-08-27
waitlist for a prior sentence based on his SAP ineligibility in this case. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001673 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“CHIPS” cases). Following their removal, the children remained continuously placed outside C.J.’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241760 - 2019-06-04
“CHIPS” cases). Following their removal, the children remained continuously placed outside C.J.’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241760 - 2019-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
these appeals. Nos. 2018AP404 2018AP405 2018AP406 2018AP407 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232533 - 2019-01-11
these appeals. Nos. 2018AP404 2018AP405 2018AP406 2018AP407 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232533 - 2019-01-11
[PDF]
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
arguments and affirm the judgments and order. Background ¶2 In Eau Claire County case No. 2002CF256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
arguments and affirm the judgments and order. Background ¶2 In Eau Claire County case No. 2002CF256
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24640 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
2001 WI App 216 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3419-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 216 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3419-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3401 - 2005-03-31