Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19941 - 19950 of 50071 for our.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The interpretation of a written contract is a question of law for our de novo review. Tang v. C.A.R.S. Prot. Plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Jones
counsel has provided no evidence of ineffective representation and we see none in our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11562 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Yeng Vang
of our supervisory power to insure the fair administration of justice, we hold that all custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
deficits … had any idea of what was going on there in our discussion about who was going to go first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the claims in her complaint. Accordingly, we limit our discussion in this opinion to those issues. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109275 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220279 - 2018-10-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s focus at sentencing on the severity of the offense, our review of the record does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204232 - 2017-12-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the plea colloquy was thorough and not deficient in any way. We agree, and upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173397 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162761 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to intervention, but such matters are reserved for the court’s discretion. We will not impose our own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21