Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19961 - 19970 of 82925 for case search.
Search results 19961 - 19970 of 82925 for case search.
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Coalition on Lead Emergency to Consultant's Report
FILED 02-08-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response of Coalition on Lead
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208leademergencycoalitionresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
FILED 02-08-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response of Coalition on Lead
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208leademergencycoalitionresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
and record, we conclude at conference No. 2020AP1107 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=486030 - 2022-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
, prior to C.A.D. filing his notice of appeal in the instant case, the County again petitioned to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Tina M. Satzke
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
briefly comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Schneck
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tina M. Satzke
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
WI APP 38
2009 WI APP 38 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35503 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 38 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35503 - 2014-09-15