Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19961 - 19970 of 58285 for speedy trial.

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4562 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sylvester Neasman
of trial counsel, Neasman sought to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that he was not denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Beloit v. William L. Tinder
-0383 2 officer. Tinder contends that the elements of the offense were not proven at trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3607 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. While the absence of a hearing in the circuit Nos. 2016AP1085
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219091 - 2018-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gregory A. Allen
. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13713 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Waupun v. Troy G. Hermans
cause to arrest him, and therefore the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13379 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the motion was granted subject to any trial objection McKercher might make to cumulative evidence under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26

Village of Oregon v. Mark A. Feiler
. During trial, the court ruled that the results of Feiler's intoxilyzer test were entitled to automatic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10746 - 2005-03-31

State v. Maurice S. Ewing
for postconviction relief. Ewing argues his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19

Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
of his employment at the time of the accident, we reverse the trial court’s order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31