Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19971 - 19980 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19971 - 19980 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
findings are affirmed unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo application of the law to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
findings are affirmed unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo application of the law to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
State v. Duane E. Elm
the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Moffett, 147 Wis.2d 343, 353, 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Moffett, 147 Wis.2d 343, 353, 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 117
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. No. 2015AP1433-D 10 See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169387 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed de novo. No. 2015AP1433-D 10 See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joel R. Zarnke
review de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
review de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
vacated is a question of law, which we review de novo. Racine County, 2008 WI 70, ¶11. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33475 - 2008-07-22
vacated is a question of law, which we review de novo. Racine County, 2008 WI 70, ¶11. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33475 - 2008-07-22
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Elaine H.
we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19548 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19548 - 2017-09-21
Anton H. Turrittin v. Town of La Pointe
the dismissal of their claim. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
the dismissal of their claim. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
Edna Grundman and the Estate of Ralph Grundman v. Martha Burgess
of statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11960 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc., 2010 WI 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694893 - 2023-08-29
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc., 2010 WI 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694893 - 2023-08-29