Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19971 - 19980 of 70126 for his.
Search results 19971 - 19980 of 70126 for his.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
that there was no reasonable suspicion to stop his car, because all that the police observed was his brief, nondescript
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346859 - 2021-03-15
that there was no reasonable suspicion to stop his car, because all that the police observed was his brief, nondescript
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346859 - 2021-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Daniel E. Shovers, by his Guardian ad Litem, Kevin J. Demet, Co-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39951 - 2009-08-24
, Daniel E. Shovers, by his Guardian ad Litem, Kevin J. Demet, Co-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39951 - 2009-08-24
[PDF]
WI APP 131
his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict was violated by the jury instruction stating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33501 - 2014-09-15
his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict was violated by the jury instruction stating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered in favor of his former girlfriend, Brenda.1 He also appeals an order denying his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
entered in favor of his former girlfriend, Brenda.1 He also appeals an order denying his WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
WI APP 19
and Hruz, JJ. ΒΆ1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his paternity action against Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133315 - 2017-09-21
and Hruz, JJ. ΒΆ1 STARK, J. Stuart S. appeals an order dismissing his paternity action against Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133315 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward F. Topping
and the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
and the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Certification
basing his/her cause-of- death opinion in part on the information set forth in such a report
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161309 - 2017-09-21
basing his/her cause-of- death opinion in part on the information set forth in such a report
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion and supplemental motion for postconviction relief. Mance contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209384 - 2018-07-23
denying his motion and supplemental motion for postconviction relief. Mance contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209384 - 2018-07-23
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Hereford was convicted after a retrial following a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for a new trial. Hereford was convicted after a retrial following a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald A. Hansford
was not certified to this court but was raised by the Defendant in his brief to the court of appeals, is whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17232 - 2005-03-31
was not certified to this court but was raised by the Defendant in his brief to the court of appeals, is whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17232 - 2005-03-31