Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19971 - 19980 of 58285 for speedy trial.

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Clifford A. Ferguson
to sentencing. We agree and direct the trial court to amend the judgment of conviction to reflect a credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12975 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ernest L. Smith
revoked (OAR), in violation of § 343.44(1) and (2)(e)1, STATS. The trial court dismissed the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of her trial counsel and that her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95505 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that was seized by police during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
of the accident, we reverse the trial court’s order. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 15, 1998, an automobile driven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19

State v. Alex W.S.
, the court denied the motion to suppress. At the ensuing bench trial, Alex argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14162 - 2005-03-31

Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing All Saints’ cross-claims against MMRA. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
, the trial court ruled that Rumage’s lien was not valid because Kemeling’s previous sale of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11421 - 2017-09-19