Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19981 - 19990 of 82984 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
was violated in the previous cases. The State attached to its motion a judgment of conviction from the 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16

Michael J. Koffman v. Jeremy J. Leichtfuss
2001 WI 111 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0380 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
2023 WI 33 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP102 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649909 - 2023-06-21

[PDF] Michael J. Koffman v. Jeremy J. Leichtfuss
2001 WI 111 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0380 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17482 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 20211012 FINAL Reponse to Mots Intervene.dotx
in the federal court Case 2021AP001450 Wisconsin Legislature Response to Motions to Intervene Filed 10-13-2021
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resmotionintervenewislegis.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] 2023AP001412 - Wisconsin Legislature's Motion to Intervene
Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 08-22-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001412
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1412_0822legislaturemotion.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Freedman Affidavit in Support of Pro Hac Vice Motion
the subject of a disciplinary proceeding. 1 Case 2023AP001399 Freedman Affidavit in Support of Pro Hac Vice
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0808freedmanaff.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657161 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] State v. James Robert Schroeder
sexual assault and one count of false imprisonment. The case was tried to a jury. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8218 - 2017-09-19

City of Whitewater v. Elizabeth M. Neldner
the guilty-plea-waiver rule. Because the issue in this case does not decide a matter of substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15240 - 2005-03-31