Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19981 - 19990 of 59033 for do.
Search results 19981 - 19990 of 59033 for do.
2008 WI APP 107
” and that it had not erroneously exercised its discretion in doing so. The court found that “the filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33134 - 2008-07-29
” and that it had not erroneously exercised its discretion in doing so. The court found that “the filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33134 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
language, however, do not undermine the validity of a plea. See State v. Mursal, 2013 WI App 125, ¶20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525586 - 2022-06-01
language, however, do not undermine the validity of a plea. See State v. Mursal, 2013 WI App 125, ¶20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525586 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to do so by his trial counsel. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied Banks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207570 - 2018-01-25
to do so by his trial counsel. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied Banks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207570 - 2018-01-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
the requested search. While we do not endorse the practice of issuing search warrants No. 2008AP1519-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
the requested search. While we do not endorse the practice of issuing search warrants No. 2008AP1519-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Fortune in Motion, Inc.
represented that his clients “[do] not wish to defend in this appeal and are not willing to expend any funds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11104 - 2017-09-19
represented that his clients “[do] not wish to defend in this appeal and are not willing to expend any funds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We first determine whether the meaning of the statute is plain, and in doing so examine the text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21
). We first determine whether the meaning of the statute is plain, and in doing so examine the text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 177
, however, do not provide any support for the proposition that the term “highway” in WIS. STAT. § 81.38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29380 - 2014-09-15
, however, do not provide any support for the proposition that the term “highway” in WIS. STAT. § 81.38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29380 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mai X.
and that her daughter was now doing well. It was reported, through Mai's brother acting as interpreter for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10842 - 2005-03-31
and that her daughter was now doing well. It was reported, through Mai's brother acting as interpreter for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10842 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Thompson
to come to court to testify in the [defendant’s] behalf, refusing to do so only after the judge’s lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2281 - 2005-03-31
to come to court to testify in the [defendant’s] behalf, refusing to do so only after the judge’s lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2281 - 2005-03-31
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
. ¶11 We do not agree with the County that Allen M. is controlling on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6037 - 2005-03-31
. ¶11 We do not agree with the County that Allen M. is controlling on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6037 - 2005-03-31