Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19991 - 20000 of 58532 for speedy trial.
Search results 19991 - 20000 of 58532 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
(collectively the County). Schey argues that the trial court erred by failing to give the “Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2766 - 2017-09-19
(collectively the County). Schey argues that the trial court erred by failing to give the “Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2766 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randal M. Woodard
him and whether he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5504 - 2017-09-19
him and whether he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5504 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
for one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1), the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112569 - 2014-05-20
for one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1), the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112569 - 2014-05-20
State v. Alexis C.
for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy R. Mertz
. ANDERSON, P.J. We affirm the order of the trial court revoking Randy R. Mertz’s operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, P.J. We affirm the order of the trial court revoking Randy R. Mertz’s operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and then proceed to trial on the reckless endangerment charge. We disagree with Rodriguez and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29775 - 2014-09-15
and then proceed to trial on the reckless endangerment charge. We disagree with Rodriguez and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of trial counsel and that his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial had not been violated. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
of trial counsel and that his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial had not been violated. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark R. Umhoefer
was given to the question and the trial court immediately instructed the jury that: I have sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11701 - 2005-03-31
was given to the question and the trial court immediately instructed the jury that: I have sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Gerken was not asserting any breach of duty against his trial counsel. The circuit court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116706 - 2017-09-21
that Gerken was not asserting any breach of duty against his trial counsel. The circuit court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116706 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime, which the prosecutor amended to first-degree intentional homicide on the day the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
to a crime, which the prosecutor amended to first-degree intentional homicide on the day the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05