Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21 - 30 of 89614 for discontinuing CWF in Walworth County, WI.
Search results 21 - 30 of 89614 for discontinuing CWF in Walworth County, WI.
James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
was abandoned; and (2) Wis. Stat. § 80.02[1] prohibits discontinuance of the road. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2600 - 2005-03-31
was abandoned; and (2) Wis. Stat. § 80.02[1] prohibits discontinuance of the road. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 41
2 discontinuation of two alley segments near their properties pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 66.1003(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60051 - 2014-09-15
2 discontinuation of two alley segments near their properties pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 66.1003(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60051 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
is that the Town was required to proceed under Wis. Stat. ch. 236, which grants counties (but not towns) authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
is that the Town was required to proceed under Wis. Stat. ch. 236, which grants counties (but not towns) authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
County of Rusk v. Eugene A. Ringhand
. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 635, 586 N.W.2d 863 (1998). Thus, we uphold the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6959 - 2005-03-31
. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 635, 586 N.W.2d 863 (1998). Thus, we uphold the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Rusk v. Eugene A. Ringhand
. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 635, 586 N.W.2d 863 (1998). Thus, we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6959 - 2017-09-20
. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 635, 586 N.W.2d 863 (1998). Thus, we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6959 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Allen C. Orth v. Walworth County
, V. WALWORTH COUNTY AND THE WALWORTH COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
, V. WALWORTH COUNTY AND THE WALWORTH COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marvin Herman v. County of Walworth
have made the order or determination in question. Kapischke v. County of Walworth, 226 Wis. 2d 320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18949 - 2017-09-21
have made the order or determination in question. Kapischke v. County of Walworth, 226 Wis. 2d 320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18949 - 2017-09-21
Marvin Herman v. County of Walworth
or determination in question. Kapischke v. County of Walworth, 226 Wis. 2d 320, 327-28, 595 N.W.2d 42 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18949 - 2005-08-30
or determination in question. Kapischke v. County of Walworth, 226 Wis. 2d 320, 327-28, 595 N.W.2d 42 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18949 - 2005-08-30
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
for issuing a conditional use permit as set forth in Walworth County, Wis., Zoning Ordinance § 4.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
for issuing a conditional use permit as set forth in Walworth County, Wis., Zoning Ordinance § 4.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
in WALWORTH COUNTY, WIS., ZONING ORDINANCE § 4.2 (hereinafter ORDINANCE § 4.2). In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
in WALWORTH COUNTY, WIS., ZONING ORDINANCE § 4.2 (hereinafter ORDINANCE § 4.2). In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15