Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21 - 30 of 1343 for shoe.

COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress a pair of Nike tennis shoes he was wearing when he was arrested at his mother’s house. The shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113462 - 2014-06-02

State v. Gregory Mosley
to remove his unlaced athletic shoes. Mosley initially consented and removed his right shoe. When Terhaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2749 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gregory Mosley
with phone and pager numbers on them. She then asked Mosley to remove his unlaced athletic shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2749 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Nike tennis shoes he was wearing when he was arrested at his mother’s house. The shoes tied Victor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113462 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of shoes found at a residence Tucker frequented matched a pattern found at the scene of the February 23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34663 - 2008-11-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the impression and his estimate of the shooter’s shoe size, and at trial, Parr testified consistently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502039 - 2022-04-22

[PDF] NOTICE
case included evidence that the tread pattern of shoes found at a residence Tucker frequented matched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34663 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
indicated that Hopkins was in possession of the gun. B. Shoes. ¶12 Hopkins next argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
that Hopkins was in possession of the gun. B. Shoes. ¶12 Hopkins next argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4786 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
indicated that Hopkins was in possession of the gun. B. Shoes. ¶12 Hopkins next argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31