Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21 - 30 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 21 - 30 of 58340 for speedy trial.
State v. Tina M. Satzke
to the trial court that the delay violated her rights to a speedy trial. She was tried and convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
to the trial court that the delay violated her rights to a speedy trial. She was tried and convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
constitutions guarantee criminal defendants the right to a speedy trial. The Sixth Amendment of the United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976933 - 2025-06-27
constitutions guarantee criminal defendants the right to a speedy trial. The Sixth Amendment of the United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976933 - 2025-06-27
[PDF]
WI App 28
that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial based on the No. 2022AP959-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793088 - 2024-06-20
that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial based on the No. 2022AP959-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793088 - 2024-06-20
State v. Samuel Jones
the charges against Jones because Jones was allegedly deprived of his right to a speedy trial; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12857 - 2005-03-31
the charges against Jones because Jones was allegedly deprived of his right to a speedy trial; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Jones
to dismiss the charges against Jones because Jones was allegedly deprived of his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss the charges against Jones because Jones was allegedly deprived of his right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an amended dispositional order because his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. Tyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31564 - 2014-09-15
an amended dispositional order because his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. Tyler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31564 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 4
to” WIS. STAT. § 971.10, the Speedy Trial Statute. The Speedy Trial Statute requires that a felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105578 - 2017-09-21
to” WIS. STAT. § 971.10, the Speedy Trial Statute. The Speedy Trial Statute requires that a felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105578 - 2017-09-21
WI App 4 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2243-CR Complete Title ...
for prompt disposition, “subject to” Wis. Stat. § 971.10, the Speedy Trial Statute. The Speedy Trial Statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
for prompt disposition, “subject to” Wis. Stat. § 971.10, the Speedy Trial Statute. The Speedy Trial Statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
)(a) (1999-2000).[1] McAdoo claims: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4343 - 2005-03-31
)(a) (1999-2000).[1] McAdoo claims: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
) and 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000). 1 McAdoo claims: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19
) and 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000). 1 McAdoo claims: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19