Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 201 - 210 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 201 - 210 of 17366 for Cost.
State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
in this case is whether a circuit court may properly impose as costs against a criminal defendant the expenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17529 - 2005-03-31
in this case is whether a circuit court may properly impose as costs against a criminal defendant the expenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17529 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16779 - 2017-09-21
a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16779 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 19-05
as to the assessment of reasonable costs within 10 days after the parties’ submissions regarding assessment of costs
/supreme/docs/1905petition.pdf - 2019-03-14
as to the assessment of reasonable costs within 10 days after the parties’ submissions regarding assessment of costs
/supreme/docs/1905petition.pdf - 2019-03-14
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David V. Penn
pay the costs of this reinstatement proceedings totaling $6803.64; however, we conclude that rather
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16992 - 2005-03-31
pay the costs of this reinstatement proceedings totaling $6803.64; however, we conclude that rather
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16992 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
for paying a sanction judgment previously entered by a circuit court and the cost awards related to his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83981 - 2012-06-21
for paying a sanction judgment previously entered by a circuit court and the cost awards related to his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83981 - 2012-06-21
[PDF]
WI 63
and the cost awards related to his disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings in this court. We modify
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83981 - 2014-09-15
and the cost awards related to his disciplinary and reinstatement proceedings in this court. We modify
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83981 - 2014-09-15
Ron Strand v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
that they did not need to replace personal property in order to obtain the benefit of replacement cost coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4236 - 2005-03-31
that they did not need to replace personal property in order to obtain the benefit of replacement cost coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ron Strand v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
to obtain the benefit of replacement cost coverage under the terms of their insurance policy. They also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4236 - 2017-09-19
to obtain the benefit of replacement cost coverage under the terms of their insurance policy. They also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard J. Krueger
for a No. 2003AP2558-D 2 period of 60 days. We also agree with the referee that the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21495 - 2017-09-21
for a No. 2003AP2558-D 2 period of 60 days. We also agree with the referee that the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21495 - 2017-09-21