Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 201 - 210 of 59264 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
the Bank, asserting claims of breach of warranty deed, breach of contract, intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13714 - 2014-09-15

Les Lee R. Lucareli v. Leigh M. Lucareli
of appointment. ¶3 Les Lee claims that he had authority to execute the deed to all three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15686 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Les Lee R. Lucareli v. Leigh M. Lucareli
a deed granting property to himself. ¶13 Les Lee claims that his execution of the deed was effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15686 - 2017-09-21

Susan K. Kampinen v. Donald C. Bierman
of Kampinen’s adverse claim based on her deed.[3] By the Court.—Judgment reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16298 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan K. Kampinen v. Donald C. Bierman
claim based on her deed.3 By the Court.—Judgment reversed. This opinion will not be published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16298 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it determined that a 2020 quitclaim deed did not revoke a 2016 transfer-on-death (“TOD”) beneficiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780085 - 2024-03-27

James D. Vance v. Thomas H. Thiede
of the mortgages was recorded with the register of deeds. Thomas drafted a quit claim deed on January 20 conveying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2839 - 2005-03-31

Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
and determination. The issue we certify is whether a county, after taking a tax deed to assume ownership
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12

[PDF] Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
the statute of frauds. They further claimed that there was no mistake and, accordingly, the deed could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15937 - 2017-09-21

Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
." The court also decided that the deed was ambiguous as a whole because it claimed to be in satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15937 - 2005-03-31