Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 201 - 210 of 46923 for shows.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
erred in refusing to allow him to introduce evidence to show that the victim had a predisposition toward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28299 - 2007-03-05

[PDF] State v. Spring A. Long
argued that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge her extradition and a show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15730 - 2017-09-21

State v. Spring A. Long
that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge her extradition and a show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leonard L. Davis
was “slight” and unintentional, and that the jury showed no reaction to it. ¶4 The defendant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15150 - 2017-09-21

State v. Leonard L. Davis
, and that the jury showed no reaction to it. ¶4 The defendant is entitled to the trial court’s in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15150 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must show both that his lawyer’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98006 - 2014-09-15

State v. Keith A. Hewitt
. 2052 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18685 - 2005-06-22

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel, a defendant must show both that his lawyer’s performance was deficient and that the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98006 - 2013-06-10

[PDF] State v. Keith A. Hewitt
, 104 S. Ct. 2052 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18685 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rodney C. Burkins
which he had to show. Burkins relies on Ozaukee County v. Quelle, 542 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9406 - 2005-03-31