Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 201 - 210 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 201 - 210 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
IN RE THE MATTER OF JURY TRIALS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
and the defendant in a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. sec. 971.10(3)(a); NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
/news/docs/jurytrials1.pdf - 2020-03-22
and the defendant in a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. sec. 971.10(3)(a); NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
/news/docs/jurytrials1.pdf - 2020-03-22
State v. Joe J. Davis
a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joe J. Davis
to timely make a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16308 - 2017-09-21
to timely make a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joe J. Davis
to timely make a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
to timely make a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joe J. Davis
a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2011-12-26
a motion for a speedy trial or for failing to move to dismiss once the deadline had passed. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2011-12-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. He claims that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, that charges should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
relief. He claims that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, that charges should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, that charges should not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28760 - 2006-08-08
claims that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, that charges should not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28760 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. § 974.06 (2011-12)1 motion in which he claimed a violation of his constitutional speedy trial right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92143 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2011-12)1 motion in which he claimed a violation of his constitutional speedy trial right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92143 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a penalty enhancer for using a dangerous weapon. ¶3 On March 11, 2008, Graham made a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
a penalty enhancer for using a dangerous weapon. ¶3 On March 11, 2008, Graham made a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a dangerous weapon. ¶3 On March 11, 2008, Graham made a speedy trial demand. Over the next seven months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
a dangerous weapon. ¶3 On March 11, 2008, Graham made a speedy trial demand. Over the next seven months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21