Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 3963 for davi.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 3963 for davi.
[PDF]
WI App 52
Davis Dávila of Davis & Pledl, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975474 - 2025-09-18
Davis Dávila of Davis & Pledl, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975474 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
WI App 53
and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266005 - 2020-09-14
and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266005 - 2020-09-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the claim preclusion doctrine and that his filings be nonfrivolous. See In re Davis, 878 F.2d 211, 213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
with the claim preclusion doctrine and that his filings be nonfrivolous. See In re Davis, 878 F.2d 211, 213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
the fair administration of justice,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19
the fair administration of justice,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion in imposing the condition. State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶12, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
its discretion in imposing the condition. State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶12, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
. Davis, 171 Wis.2d 711, 716, 492 N.W.2d 174, 176 (Ct. App. 1992). Because Vander Logt was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
. Davis, 171 Wis.2d 711, 716, 492 N.W.2d 174, 176 (Ct. App. 1992). Because Vander Logt was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
State v. John Casteel
,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and to control its docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
,” City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, 226 Wis. 2d 738, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and to control its docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2015-06-17
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2015-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Ernest E. Halford
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19