Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 3969 for davie.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 3969 for davie.
COURT OF APPEALS
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2015-06-17
Association].” The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143255 - 2015-06-17
[PDF]
WI App 53
and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266005 - 2020-09-14
and Davis, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266005 - 2020-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP2634 3 The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143255 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2634 3 The County also retained another law firm, Davis & Kuelthau, to handle certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
. Davis, 171 Wis.2d 711, 716, 492 N.W.2d 174, 176 (Ct. App. 1992). Because Vander Logt was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
. Davis, 171 Wis.2d 711, 716, 492 N.W.2d 174, 176 (Ct. App. 1992). Because Vander Logt was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the claim preclusion doctrine and that his filings be nonfrivolous. See In re Davis, 878 F.2d 211, 213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
with the claim preclusion doctrine and that his filings be nonfrivolous. See In re Davis, 878 F.2d 211, 213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332728 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Ernest E. Halford
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
conversation. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 458 (1994).3 Under Edwards, once the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
Laverne Haase v. Badger Mining Corporation
brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady LLP
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16641 - 2005-03-31
brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong and Quarles & Brady LLP
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16641 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Order affirmed; order reversed. Before Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32214 - 2008-03-25
for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Order affirmed; order reversed. Before Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32214 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
Laverne Haase v. Badger Mining Corporation
. Gordon. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16641 - 2017-09-21
. Gordon. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Jeffrey O. Davis, Nora M. Platt, O. Thomas Armstrong
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26