Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 2587 for dnr.

[PDF] All City Communication Company, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5222 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
on a factual discrepancy. See Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477 N.W.2d 648 (Ct. App. 1991) (“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45529 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that particular point as conceded for purposes of this opinion. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249483 - 2019-11-05

[PDF] WI APP 148
are deemed forfeited and cannot be raised for the first time on judicial review. See Omernick v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55134 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
in a responsive brief as concessions. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2801 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in a concession to the Commissioner’s position. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52859 - 2014-09-15

Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
is such that reasonable jurors could return a verdict for the non-moving party. Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6690 - 2005-03-31

Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
asserted based on the contention that Sutula’s acts were ministerial. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
properly supported motion for summary judgment,” however. Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35186 - 2009-01-13

2010 WI APP 148
on judicial review. See Omernick v. DNR, 100 Wis. 2d 234, 248-49, 301 N.W.2d 437 (1981). “The [forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55134 - 2010-11-16