Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 68875 for he.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 68875 for he.
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
). Hernandez contends that trial counsel did not properly prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
). Hernandez contends that trial counsel did not properly prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
, 1998. It is from this order that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14041 - 2014-09-15
, 1998. It is from this order that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14041 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he and his counsel met only three times prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he and his counsel met only three times prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
)(a) & (5), STATS. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11349 - 2017-09-19
)(a) & (5), STATS. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11349 - 2017-09-19
State v. Reed Cudnohusky
postconviction relief.[1] He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief.[1] He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, and voluntary because he was not competent at the time he entered the plea. In addition, he alleged that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28153 - 2007-02-20
, and voluntary because he was not competent at the time he entered the plea. In addition, he alleged that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28153 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Church
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
in his car. At the time of the accident in August 2001, Leiteritz was driving a 1987 car which he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19
in his car. At the time of the accident in August 2001, Leiteritz was driving a 1987 car which he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19