Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 6401 for wide.
Search results 2001 - 2010 of 6401 for wide.
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
outside the wide range of professionally competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
outside the wide range of professionally competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11
or omissions of counsel that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 507-08. The weight to be given one factor is within the sentencing court’s wide discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
. at 507-08. The weight to be given one factor is within the sentencing court’s wide discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Albert G. Holman
otherwise. ¶14 As we have noted: It is well established that a trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16318 - 2017-09-21
otherwise. ¶14 As we have noted: It is well established that a trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shannon Jeanne Krug v. Theodore Richard Krug
. ¶6 “A trial court has wide discretion to reconsider an earlier decision, and nothing prevents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19033 - 2017-09-21
. ¶6 “A trial court has wide discretion to reconsider an earlier decision, and nothing prevents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19033 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
A trial court has wide discretion in determining what jury instructions will be given and if the given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12081 - 2017-09-21
A trial court has wide discretion in determining what jury instructions will be given and if the given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77606 - 2014-09-15
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77606 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
be “a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” LeMere, 262 Wis. 2d 426, ¶13. There are often a wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15
be “a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” LeMere, 262 Wis. 2d 426, ¶13. There are often a wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28818 - 2014-09-15