Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20001 - 20010 of 30242 for de.

[PDF] State v. Michael V. Norton
of facts constitutes probable cause is a question of law that the court of appeals will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5663 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and affirm. ¶10 We review de novo whether the circuit court followed proper procedures in exercising its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701407 - 2023-09-13

State v. Minko Lewis
. Franks, 438 U.S. at 156. We review a court’s denial of a defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4021 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paul F. Wischer
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6657 - 2005-03-31

Ahmad Abu Naaj v. Aetna Insurance Company
and will not be repeated here. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis.2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476-77 (1980). Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11870 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randy D. Stafford
constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth Blue
. However, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3182 - 2009-06-29

State v. Everton Taylor
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings establish a breach of fiduciary duty presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746641 - 2024-01-03

State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15483 - 2010-07-26