Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 29751 for des.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 29751 for des.
Timothy A.K. v. Carrie B.C.
de novo. See State Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis. 2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15880 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State Seep v. Personnel Comm’n, 140 Wis. 2d 32, 38, 409 N.W.2d 142, 144 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15880 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
is de minimus or nonprejudicial. To do otherwise would invite a flood of motions raising trivial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44709 - 2014-09-15
is de minimus or nonprejudicial. To do otherwise would invite a flood of motions raising trivial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s decision on a suppression motion under the clearly erroneous standard, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161376 - 2017-09-21
a circuit court’s decision on a suppression motion under the clearly erroneous standard, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66433 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66433 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
a hearing is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
Miller Brewing Company v. Department of Industry
to decide an issue, our review is de novo and we will not give any deference to the agency's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31
to decide an issue, our review is de novo and we will not give any deference to the agency's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Discussion ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107502 - 2017-09-21
. Discussion ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts amount to probable cause to arrest is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21
facts amount to probable cause to arrest is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21