Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 65136 for or b.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 65136 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the probationer has already provided a statement admitting the violation. WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35010 - 2014-09-15
the probationer has already provided a statement admitting the violation. WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 331.04(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35010 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
. That is a contingency which fits the definition of maintenance under 26 U.S.C. § 71(b)(1)(D). Even accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
. That is a contingency which fits the definition of maintenance under 26 U.S.C. § 71(b)(1)(D). Even accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
Diane M. Farris v. David C. Walhovd
of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15995 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143091 - 2017-09-21
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143091 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
without a hearing, reasoning that “[b]ecause the proffered evidence[] does not indicate what the console
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28152 - 2014-09-15
without a hearing, reasoning that “[b]ecause the proffered evidence[] does not indicate what the console
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28152 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
court imposed a lengthier sentence predicated on his “[b]ad [c]haracter,” including its mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35582 - 2014-09-15
court imposed a lengthier sentence predicated on his “[b]ad [c]haracter,” including its mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35582 - 2014-09-15
Michael J. Glunz v. Laura A. Sokol
as a part of the marital estate. B. Kemper Account. ¶9 Sokol also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2605 - 2005-03-31
as a part of the marital estate. B. Kemper Account. ¶9 Sokol also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2605 - 2005-03-31
Racine County v. Mary Jane S.
for residential care and custody; (b) Except in the case of a minor who is alleged to be developmentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6278 - 2005-03-31
for residential care and custody; (b) Except in the case of a minor who is alleged to be developmentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01, 939.32, 940.23(1)(a), & 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88743 - 2012-10-29
. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01, 939.32, 940.23(1)(a), & 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88743 - 2012-10-29