Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20011 - 20020 of 58492 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
judgments convicting her, following a trial to the court, of retail theft, resisting arrest, and battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104355 - 2013-11-11
judgments convicting her, following a trial to the court, of retail theft, resisting arrest, and battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104355 - 2013-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence to convict him and argues that the trial court, as fact-finder, failed to consider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118087 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence to convict him and argues that the trial court, as fact-finder, failed to consider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Clifford A. Ferguson
to sentencing. We agree and direct the trial court to amend the judgment of conviction to reflect a credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12975 - 2017-09-21
to sentencing. We agree and direct the trial court to amend the judgment of conviction to reflect a credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12975 - 2017-09-21
Julie A. Jakubowski v. Rock Valley Builders, Inc.
by § ATCP 110.05(1). We remanded to the trial court for a determination of amounts owed RVB by the McLeans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13776 - 2005-03-31
by § ATCP 110.05(1). We remanded to the trial court for a determination of amounts owed RVB by the McLeans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13776 - 2005-03-31
Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
could foreclose against the current owners, Robert and Janet Gullberg. At summary judgment, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
could foreclose against the current owners, Robert and Janet Gullberg. At summary judgment, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was supported by reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence at trial. In addition, we conclude the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
was supported by reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence at trial. In addition, we conclude the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester Neasman
. No. 01-2252 2 Claiming he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, Neasman sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
. No. 01-2252 2 Claiming he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, Neasman sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial in the interests of justice. We conclude that none of these arguments have merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
to a new trial in the interests of justice. We conclude that none of these arguments have merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22
[PDF]
State v. Ernest L. Smith
revoked (OAR), in violation of § 343.44(1) and (2)(e)1, STATS. The trial court dismissed the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19
revoked (OAR), in violation of § 343.44(1) and (2)(e)1, STATS. The trial court dismissed the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
2006AP2069-CR 2 denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by counsel’s failure to file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
2006AP2069-CR 2 denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by counsel’s failure to file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15