Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20021 - 20030 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
Search results 20021 - 20030 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
, with costs, and dismissed the Eggers’ case with prejudice. Cumberland sent notices of entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
, with costs, and dismissed the Eggers’ case with prejudice. Cumberland sent notices of entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54754 - 2014-09-15
WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
. Aschenbrenner acknowledges a recent federal case supporting the State’s view, but asks that we include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me right.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me right.” ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
George Harrison v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1795
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11010 - 2005-03-31
State v. James O. Edwards
2002 WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3684 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot because Mr. Z. is no longer subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
)(a). The parties agree that this case would ordinarily be considered moot because Mr. Z. is no longer subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
the Eggers’ motion to vacate judgment and reopen the case, but Cargill did not submit an appellate brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
the Eggers’ motion to vacate judgment and reopen the case, but Cargill did not submit an appellate brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
discovery [sic], look through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
discovery [sic], look through my case, know my charges. I don’t feel [trial counsel is] representing me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI AP 121
2012 WI AP 121 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2011AP1949
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI AP 121 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2011AP1949
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87626 - 2014-09-15