Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20021 - 20030 of 74552 for public records.

[PDF] NOTICE
or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32438 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
, recorded on August 28, 1995. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6331—6344, the IRS seized the Stress property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15062 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14

[PDF] Luai M. Hinnawi v.
records, the referee found that Attorney Hinnawi converted to his own use $94,583.56 of estate assets
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17018 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
that he raised this issue in the trial court twice. His reply brief, however, fails to provide record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19

Daniel Substad v. Frances Thorson
argument. Because Minnesota statutes and the public policy behind them allow for the deduction, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13105 - 2005-03-31

Tower Insurance Company, Inc. v. Gary Carpenter
but also on principles of sound public policy. Id. at 110-11, 341 N.W.2d at 663. Such a rule promotes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9865 - 2005-03-31

Lisa Menick v. City of Menasha
of the Wisconsin Constitution provides that “the property of no person shall be taken for public use without just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8537 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lisa Menick v. City of Menasha
be taken for public use without just compensation therefor without mention of damage.” Id. at 6, 87 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8537 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
his appellate counsel withdrew, the public defender’s office declined to appoint successor counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19