Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20021 - 20030 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 20021 - 20030 of 58506 for speedy trial.
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4565 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4565 - 2005-03-31
City of Beloit v. William L. Tinder
prohibiting obstructing an officer. Tinder contends that the elements of the offense were not proven at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3607 - 2005-03-31
prohibiting obstructing an officer. Tinder contends that the elements of the offense were not proven at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Mark A. Feiler
. During trial, the court ruled that the results of Feiler's intoxilyzer test were entitled to automatic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10746 - 2017-09-20
. During trial, the court ruled that the results of Feiler's intoxilyzer test were entitled to automatic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10746 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Jay D. Graff
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress based upon his claim that his arrest was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19211 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress based upon his claim that his arrest was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19211 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sylvester Neasman
of trial counsel, Neasman sought to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that he was not denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel, Neasman sought to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that he was not denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4324 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4564 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was supported by reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence at trial. In addition, we conclude the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
was supported by reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence at trial. In addition, we conclude the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 Q.S. appeals the orders of the trial court terminating his parental rights to N.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532006 - 2022-06-14
. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 Q.S. appeals the orders of the trial court terminating his parental rights to N.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532006 - 2022-06-14
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4563 - 2005-03-31