Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 82919 for case search.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 82919 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12450 - 2017-09-21
testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any different than any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12450 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee County v. Earlie W.
in ordering protective placement because the facts of each case do not support such an order; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8278 - 2005-03-31
in ordering protective placement because the facts of each case do not support such an order; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8278 - 2005-03-31
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
.” Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d at 155-156 (footnote in original). ¶4 Wideman and Spaeth, cases involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
.” Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d at 155-156 (footnote in original). ¶4 Wideman and Spaeth, cases involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10304 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10304 - 2017-09-20
Milwaukee County v. Anna B.
in ordering protective placement because the facts of each case do not support such an order; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8169 - 2005-03-31
in ordering protective placement because the facts of each case do not support such an order; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shirley E.
2006 WI APP 55 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2752
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21378 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 55 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2752
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, cases involving two very similar penalty enhancing statutes, were decided by the Wisconsin Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
, cases involving two very similar penalty enhancing statutes, were decided by the Wisconsin Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brooke A. Ptacek v. Minnesota Fire and Casualty Company
be in the best interests of the parties. Ptacek stated that she “tried to resolve this claim and move the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4521 - 2017-09-19
be in the best interests of the parties. Ptacek stated that she “tried to resolve this claim and move the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of misdemeanor criminal damage to property in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number 2009CM1567 on March 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
of misdemeanor criminal damage to property in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number 2009CM1567 on March 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15