Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 64190 for records.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 64190 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447213 - 2021-11-04
, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=447213 - 2021-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a copy of the report, and Pederson responded to it. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21
with a copy of the report, and Pederson responded to it. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP496-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206776 - 2018-01-10
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP496-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206776 - 2018-01-10
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10141 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
a question for him. Their discussion took place off the record, and defense counsel then informed the court
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12349 - 2005-03-31
a question for him. Their discussion took place off the record, and defense counsel then informed the court
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142936 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142936 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390390 - 2021-07-15