Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 20031 - 20040 of 63980 for records/1000.
State v. Alan Michael Wiedenhoeft
the record reflects that the petition was timely filed, we affirm the order. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15966 - 2005-03-31
the record reflects that the petition was timely filed, we affirm the order. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary McKnight v. Teachers Retirement Board of Wisconsin
there was substantial evidence in the record to support the employer’s determination and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2943 - 2017-09-19
there was substantial evidence in the record to support the employer’s determination and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2943 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We conclude that the record establishes that Thomas F.W. validly requested and received a seven-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
. We conclude that the record establishes that Thomas F.W. validly requested and received a seven-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36121 - 2014-09-15
State v. James J. Kempinski
and that the record does not reveal strong proof of guilt. An Alford plea is a conditional guilty plea in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
and that the record does not reveal strong proof of guilt. An Alford plea is a conditional guilty plea in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100809 - 2013-08-12
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100809 - 2013-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the requested relief. We then ordered the record supplemented with the postconviction motion and order. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268585 - 2020-07-14
the requested relief. We then ordered the record supplemented with the postconviction motion and order. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268585 - 2020-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, thus extending the proceedings beyond the statutory time limits. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
, thus extending the proceedings beyond the statutory time limits. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
, we independently review the record to determine whether the facts provide support for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
, we independently review the record to determine whether the facts provide support for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
State v. David Gallagher
and that the record shows that he entered his no contest plea voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
and that the record shows that he entered his no contest plea voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the cases. ¶2 We conclude that the record establishes that Campbell did not contest the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83435 - 2014-09-15
of the cases. ¶2 We conclude that the record establishes that Campbell did not contest the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83435 - 2014-09-15