Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20041 - 20050 of 29817 for des.
Search results 20041 - 20050 of 29817 for des.
David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
). These are questions of law that we review de novo. DISCUSSION ¶13 Umhoefer contends that the Commission violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31
). These are questions of law that we review de novo. DISCUSSION ¶13 Umhoefer contends that the Commission violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret Barber v. Carole Barber Stoviak
standard for undue influence is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3937 - 2017-09-20
standard for undue influence is a question of law that we review de novo. See Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3937 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 27
of law we review de novo. Smith v. Goshaw, 2019 WI App 23, ¶9, 387 Wis. 2d 620, 928 N.W.2d 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
of law we review de novo. Smith v. Goshaw, 2019 WI App 23, ¶9, 387 Wis. 2d 620, 928 N.W.2d 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131640 - 2017-09-21
seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts presented by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law,” which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366649 - 2021-05-13
of facts presented by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law,” which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366649 - 2021-05-13
State v. Kerby G. Denman
review de novo. See State v. Bernstein, 231 Wis. 2d 392, 399, 605 N.W.2d 555 (Ct. App. 1999), review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Bernstein, 231 Wis. 2d 392, 399, 605 N.W.2d 555 (Ct. App. 1999), review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06
of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06
[PDF]
Dawn D. Wilson v. Patrick A. Wilson
review de novo. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). ¶3 Dawn and Patrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15249 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). ¶3 Dawn and Patrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15249 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31