Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 65135 for or b.
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
evidence did not constitute an erroneous exercise of discretion. B. Denial of Request to Use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
evidence did not constitute an erroneous exercise of discretion. B. Denial of Request to Use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
Robert L. Perkins v. Leonard E. Szymkowiak
in reasonable working condition, except as provided in sub. (3) (b). 5. For a residential tenancy, comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2566 - 2005-03-31
in reasonable working condition, except as provided in sub. (3) (b). 5. For a residential tenancy, comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2566 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. State v. Hardwick, 144 Wis. 2d 54, 59, 422 N.W.2d 922 (Ct. App. 1988). “[B]oth the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
probation. State v. Hardwick, 144 Wis. 2d 54, 59, 422 N.W.2d 922 (Ct. App. 1988). “[B]oth the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
Nationscredit Financial Services Corporation v. Francisco Guerrido
Nationscredit Financial Services Corporation, d/b/a EquiCredit, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4453 - 2005-03-31
Nationscredit Financial Services Corporation, d/b/a EquiCredit, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4453 - 2005-03-31
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Todd M. Spoehr v. Regina R. Woroniecki
), or (b) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (c) the party failing to admit had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6026 - 2017-09-19
), or (b) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (c) the party failing to admit had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6026 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (b) Only to the extent that it is actually occupied and: 1. Protected by a substantial enclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35420 - 2009-02-02
; and (b) Only to the extent that it is actually occupied and: 1. Protected by a substantial enclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35420 - 2009-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17, decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17, decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
of maintenance under 26 U.S.C. § 71(b)(1)(D). Even accepting Elizabeth's concession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
of maintenance under 26 U.S.C. § 71(b)(1)(D). Even accepting Elizabeth's concession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) Except as provided in [WIS. STAT. §] 20.931(5)(b), a civil action in which a personal judgment is sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21
) Except as provided in [WIS. STAT. §] 20.931(5)(b), a civil action in which a personal judgment is sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21