Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 59372 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 59372 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Digicorp then added a claim against Ameritech. Ameritech counterclaimed against Digicorp, cross-claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26904 - 2006-10-23
. Digicorp then added a claim against Ameritech. Ameritech counterclaimed against Digicorp, cross-claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26904 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” and that Little “has not submitted any corroborating evidence for his claim that the victim’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
” and that Little “has not submitted any corroborating evidence for his claim that the victim’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that her claims are procedurally barred, we affirm. No. 2009AP3186-CR 2 I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64465 - 2014-09-15
conclude that her claims are procedurally barred, we affirm. No. 2009AP3186-CR 2 I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64465 - 2014-09-15
State v. James M. Smith
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Smith was charged on February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Smith was charged on February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Memo in Support of Motion to Intervene (Citizen Mathematicians)
) they claim an interest sufficiently related to the subject of this action; (C) disposition of this action
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/memosupmotintcitizenmath.pdf - 2021-10-18
) they claim an interest sufficiently related to the subject of this action; (C) disposition of this action
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/memosupmotintcitizenmath.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that by failing to file a suppression motion on these bases, his counsel performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832315 - 2024-07-31
claims that by failing to file a suppression motion on these bases, his counsel performed deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832315 - 2024-07-31
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine Jones
on ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Jones claimed that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8191 - 2017-09-19
on ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Jones claimed that his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8191 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard L. Harris
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12491 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Harris claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12491 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jones
, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michele Kae Triebold v. Mark Edwin Triebold
to relief under WIS. STAT. § 806.07 on grounds of mistake and fraud. Specifically, Mark claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21
to relief under WIS. STAT. § 806.07 on grounds of mistake and fraud. Specifically, Mark claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21