Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 20051 - 20060 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. David J. Cleveland
denying his postconviction motions. ¶2 Cleveland argues that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16108 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motions. ¶2 Cleveland argues that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shannon L.L.
grounds: (1) the trial court erred by admitting “other acts” evidence, and (2) the juvenile court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8104 - 2017-09-19
grounds: (1) the trial court erred by admitting “other acts” evidence, and (2) the juvenile court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of child enticement. Carstens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482056 - 2022-02-08
a judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of child enticement. Carstens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482056 - 2022-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following a bench trial, Michael Cefalu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228640 - 2019-06-17
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following a bench trial, Michael Cefalu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228640 - 2019-06-17
CA Blank Order
patdown search conducted at the scene. At trial, the officers who conducted the patdown testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139662 - 2015-04-08
patdown search conducted at the scene. At trial, the officers who conducted the patdown testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139662 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
State v. John Foster Fant
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fant argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fant argues: (1) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
Diane L. Finster v. James R. Finster
support obligations of James Finster, her former spouse. She argues that although the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5892 - 2005-03-31
support obligations of James Finster, her former spouse. She argues that although the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5892 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Coleman
. The circuit court found probable cause to bind Coleman over for trial and set the arraignment date for August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4307 - 2005-03-31
. The circuit court found probable cause to bind Coleman over for trial and set the arraignment date for August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Burroughs
” statute or “three strikes” law, § 939.62(2m)(b), (c), and the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3738 - 2017-09-19
” statute or “three strikes” law, § 939.62(2m)(b), (c), and the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3738 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles J. Burroughs
strikes” law, § 939.62(2m)(b), (c), and the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31
strikes” law, § 939.62(2m)(b), (c), and the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3738 - 2005-03-31