Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 69480 for as he.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 69480 for as he.
State v. Maurice A. Jones
understood the documents. The trial court informed Jones of the elements of each crime to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5229 - 2005-03-31
understood the documents. The trial court informed Jones of the elements of each crime to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at an intersection when he stepped in front of their car and the driver had to swerve to avoid hitting him. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101950 - 2013-09-16
at an intersection when he stepped in front of their car and the driver had to swerve to avoid hitting him. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101950 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is the holder of the note and mortgage. He also concedes that the modification agreement required him to make
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346277 - 2021-03-16
is the holder of the note and mortgage. He also concedes that the modification agreement required him to make
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346277 - 2021-03-16
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
be sentenced as a repeater if he or she admits the prior conviction or if the conviction is proved by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
be sentenced as a repeater if he or she admits the prior conviction or if the conviction is proved by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9603 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Muetz
— the State argued that he was “someone who’s clearly out of control,” and that the maximum period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12788 - 2005-03-31
— the State argued that he was “someone who’s clearly out of control,” and that the maximum period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12788 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Yildirim maintenance and child support based on imputed income. He argues that: (1) the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36540 - 2009-05-20
Yildirim maintenance and child support based on imputed income. He argues that: (1) the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36540 - 2009-05-20
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
burglary charges, contrary to § 943.10(1)(a), STATS., as a repeater, § 939.62, STATS. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13541 - 2017-09-21
burglary charges, contrary to § 943.10(1)(a), STATS., as a repeater, § 939.62, STATS. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13541 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint, he alleged that after he completed a twenty- year prison sentence, the DOC acted negligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191056 - 2017-09-21
complaint, he alleged that after he completed a twenty- year prison sentence, the DOC acted negligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2019AP1893-CR 2 of a witness, as a repeater.1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
2019AP1893-CR 2 of a witness, as a repeater.1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
finding his refusal to submit to chemical testing unreasonable. He contends the officer violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29293 - 2014-09-15
finding his refusal to submit to chemical testing unreasonable. He contends the officer violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29293 - 2014-09-15

