Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶36. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶36. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances, which are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Frisch, 304 Wis. 2d 1, ¶29. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-09
circumstances, which are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Frisch, 304 Wis. 2d 1, ¶29. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-09
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Reinaldo R.P.
the services ordered by the court.” As we have noted, it is not our role to decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
the services ordered by the court.” As we have noted, it is not our role to decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eau Claire County DHS v. Christopher D. L., Sr.
interpretation is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26114 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26114 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rolando M. Tong
determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference” to the magistrate’s decision. Illinois v. Gates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference” to the magistrate’s decision. Illinois v. Gates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 236 Wis. 2d 162, 613 N.W.2d 568. We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35454 - 2014-09-15
, 236 Wis. 2d 162, 613 N.W.2d 568. We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35454 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Matthew C. Janssen
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12444 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12444 - 2017-09-21
Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo.[3] See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo.[3] See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133310 - 2015-01-20
of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133310 - 2015-01-20
WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP838 Complete Title of ...
conduct a de novo review to determine whether the record shows that there is “no genuine issue as to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78554 - 2012-03-27
conduct a de novo review to determine whether the record shows that there is “no genuine issue as to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78554 - 2012-03-27