Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 69114 for he.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
Peter J. Ambler v. Richard F. Rice
claim because it determined that he had not established his innocence by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19
claim because it determined that he had not established his innocence by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rosemary J. Dudzik
at approximately 2:50 a.m. and observed a vehicle stop and make what he considered to be a faster and wider than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6269 - 2005-03-31
at approximately 2:50 a.m. and observed a vehicle stop and make what he considered to be a faster and wider than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6269 - 2005-03-31
County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
determining that he constructed a dwelling without a permit and that he extended or enlarged a private sewage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16097 - 2005-03-31
determining that he constructed a dwelling without a permit and that he extended or enlarged a private sewage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16097 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misconduct. He claimed that his counsel failed to call four witnesses at trial that would have given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
misconduct. He claimed that his counsel failed to call four witnesses at trial that would have given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
recklessly endangering safety. During his custodial interview with police, Velez claimed that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
recklessly endangering safety. During his custodial interview with police, Velez claimed that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
contrary to § 940.01(1)(a) and WIS. STAT. § 939.32. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5046 - 2017-09-19
contrary to § 940.01(1)(a) and WIS. STAT. § 939.32. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5046 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carl Edward Rucker v. Jewel Food Store
(collectively, “Jewel”), in Rucker’s suit seeking damages for food poisoning that he alleges occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7180 - 2017-09-20
(collectively, “Jewel”), in Rucker’s suit seeking damages for food poisoning that he alleges occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7180 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress incriminating drug evidence found during a search of his person. He alleges probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245311 - 2019-08-21
to suppress incriminating drug evidence found during a search of his person. He alleges probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245311 - 2019-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal, he recites the first group of elements. In response, Haefner argues that these are the incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30504 - 2007-10-03
on appeal, he recites the first group of elements. In response, Haefner argues that these are the incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30504 - 2007-10-03
State v. Harry L. Gant
brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] Gant argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] Gant argues that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31