Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 81978 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 81978 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
State v. Marlowe Palmore
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11771 - 2017-09-20
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11771 - 2017-09-20
State v. Thomas C. Johnson
to perform field sobriety tests. Koenig arrested Johnson for OWI and handcuffed him. Johnson then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6166 - 2005-03-31
to perform field sobriety tests. Koenig arrested Johnson for OWI and handcuffed him. Johnson then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Stankiewicz
. Several field sobriety tests were then administered to Stankiewicz which he performed unsatisfactorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20
. Several field sobriety tests were then administered to Stankiewicz which he performed unsatisfactorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence admissible under the test set forth in State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 772-73, 576 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
the evidence admissible under the test set forth in State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 772-73, 576 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Johnson
tests. Koenig arrested Johnson for OWI and handcuffed him. Johnson then asked to take the field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6166 - 2017-09-19
tests. Koenig arrested Johnson for OWI and handcuffed him. Johnson then asked to take the field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6166 - 2017-09-19
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TED E. WEDEMEYER, JR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TED E. WEDEMEYER, JR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2020AP174 State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2020AP174 State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369231 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
State v. John Norman
. 2d 204, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982), this court articulated a multi-step test for determining when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16574 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 204, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982), this court articulated a multi-step test for determining when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16574 - 2017-09-21
State v. John Norman
articulated a multi-step test for determining when hearsay evidence is admissible in a criminal trial without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16574 - 2005-03-31
articulated a multi-step test for determining when hearsay evidence is admissible in a criminal trial without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16574 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶¶20, 34-43. Instead, a multi-factor, “intent-effects” test is used to determine whether statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
., ¶¶20, 34-43. Instead, a multi-factor, “intent-effects” test is used to determine whether statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23