Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
Search results 20071 - 20080 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
Kay Hoverman v. Chuck Frautschi
and that Frautschi has failed to support his constitutional claim of the right to bear arms. This court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12735 - 2005-03-31
and that Frautschi has failed to support his constitutional claim of the right to bear arms. This court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12735 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed in his first Machner hearing. He claimed trial counsel failed to: pursue exculpatory footprint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34566 - 2008-11-11
discussed in his first Machner hearing. He claimed trial counsel failed to: pursue exculpatory footprint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34566 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
and incomplete. We conclude that Allen’s claim that denial of her motion in limine was error is too inadequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95729 - 2013-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶8 Without taking evidence, the circuit court denied both Williams’ claim regarding the DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
hearing. ¶8 Without taking evidence, the circuit court denied both Williams’ claim regarding the DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the State breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009659 - 2025-09-17
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the State breached the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009659 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2008AP1481 2 (2007-08).1 Because Warren’s claims are either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vernon H. Walker
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
, but that our previous decisions bar the remainder of Walker’s claims. 2 We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Walker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
on the ground that Jones’s claim was barred by State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lee A. Brown
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Brown claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Specifically, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105642 - 2017-09-21
.” Specifically, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105642 - 2017-09-21