Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Frontsheet
2013 WI 43 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP1240 Complete Title: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97036 - 2013-05-29
2013 WI 43 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP1240 Complete Title: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97036 - 2013-05-29
Frontsheet
2009 WI 78 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2670 Complete Title: Ruben Baez
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37673 - 2009-07-13
2009 WI 78 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2670 Complete Title: Ruben Baez
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37673 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
WI 78
2009 WI 78 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2670 COMPLETE TITLE: Ruben
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37673 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI 78 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2670 COMPLETE TITLE: Ruben
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37673 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
2012 WI 97 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP2057-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84909 - 2012-10-18
2012 WI 97 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP2057-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84909 - 2012-10-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63113 - 2014-09-15
not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63113 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert J. Turicik
produced a reading of 0.10%. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10003 - 2005-03-31
produced a reading of 0.10%. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728166 - 2023-11-14
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728166 - 2023-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63113 - 2011-04-25
his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63113 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Turicik
test which produced a reading of 0.10%. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10003 - 2017-09-19
test which produced a reading of 0.10%. The case was tried to a jury. The State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10003 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
separate cases with violating the injunction eleven times. He was also charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
separate cases with violating the injunction eleven times. He was also charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21