Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 29751 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. Id. ¶14 In Vogt, the court concluded that a law enforcement officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-01

COURT OF APPEALS
to facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Arends, 325 Wis. 2d 1, ¶13. ¶11 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88107 - 2012-10-10

[PDF] Jacquelyn Peronto v. Case Corporation
. § 802.08(2); Mullen v. Walczak, 2003 WI 75, ¶11, 262 Wis. 2d 708, 664 N.W.2d 76. Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7416 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conducting de novo review, however, appellate courts 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12

[PDF] Harvey Radke v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
federal suit. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Kenefick v. Hitchcock, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11924 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84444 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142991 - 2017-09-21

WI App 77 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP3036 Complete Title of...
summary judgment motion. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63469 - 2012-02-19

[PDF] NOTICE
a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60992 - 2014-09-15

Patrick F. Shelton v. Thomas Dolan
law to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14101 - 2005-03-31