Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20081 - 20090 of 77048 for search which.

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
for our review, the primary of which is whether the City can waive the $50,000 municipal damage limitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8021 - 2005-03-31

State v. John W. Kelley
title to the property in question at this time. This land contains certain old logging roads which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15420 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 146
motion, or both are available to consider an issue which was not addressed in a prior no-merit appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33673 - 2014-09-15

Anne Marie Rosplock v. David Rosplock
discretion when it went beyond the unambiguous language of the parties’ stipulation which recited how Anne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11816 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Federal Insurance Company v. Grunau Project Development, Inc.
in Schlitz Park, which had most recently been used as commercial office space by Time Warner Cable. A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joel O. Peterson
sentences for two counts of second-degree intentional homicide, to which he pleaded guilty as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
for our review, the primary of which is whether the City can waive the $50,000 municipal damage limitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7842 - 2013-03-31

Frontsheet
costs of this proceeding, which are $6,634.96 as of December 23, 2014. ¶2 No appeal has been filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138116 - 2015-03-19

[PDF]
that counsel should have objected to the prosecutor’s request to play police body camera footage, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955853 - 2025-05-15

City of Milwaukee Redevelopment Authority v. Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2874
of the instant appeals is recited in our per curiam decision, a copy of which is appended to and incorporated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5171 - 2005-03-31