Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20091 - 20100 of 84008 for case number.

COURT OF APPEALS
set restitution at the sum of those two numbers—$15,186.[2] It explained: I calculated that by just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31

State v. Thomas C. Johnson
in this case because Ladwig had no probable cause for suspecting Johnson of a crime and so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6166 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
denied Jacobs’ motion after a hearing. The court determined that with the number of law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30

COURT OF APPEALS
footnote number three lists twelve cases with language disapproved by the opinion and that Olguin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85278 - 2012-07-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of coercion may be raised as a defense to the citations in this case. However, I agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228737 - 2018-11-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297752 - 2020-10-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
: 1 We note with concern that the State’s brief identifies the victim in this case by her full name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85278 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
timeline of events with some variations in the number and details of the incidents. The State also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Johnson
of 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6166 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to refer to all involved parties in this case. 3 Zachary’s father is deceased. The parental rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12